So much of the discourse around AI assumes an inevitability to adoption, seeing quality as the only barrier to that.

Neutral observations on the Vercel vs Cloudflare race to win the edge and developer mindshare.

The future of design will still be shaped—just not by designers like Jony Ive.

A series interrogating the challenges and opportunities at the heart of the AI-creative conversation.

What if we were to model a typical software development lifecycle in code?

Meaning in art comes from more than the artifact.

The word modern has become the cure-all solution, promising to solve not just our immediate problems, but somehow prevent future ones entirely.

The disruption is real. It’s also predictable.

Here’s a thought experiment for pondering the effects AI might have on society: What if we invented teleportation?

We’re witnessing the final generation of people who translate ideas into code by hand.

Why the AI bubble argument misunderstands both bubbles and AI.

In a world of intangible assets, the only way to identify a bubble is to see it pop.

I am an AI hater. This is considered rude, but I do not care, because I am a hater.

Most AI output has a bland sameness, but that also sounds like a lot of contemporary graphic design. Is AI a chance to break free?

The fundamental design challenge, then, is not just about creating useful software. It’s about designing for ephemerality.

Seemingly conscious AI is coming.

Current AI interfaces lull us into thinking we’re talking to something that can make meaningful judgments about what’s valuable.

Simple is the opposite of complex, where easy is something that’s familiar to us. Different things. Especially in software.

A designer’s search for meaning in a world that's hyper-focused on productivity.

Even if we manage to snap out of the AI bubble, we are never going to get these years back.